Creative output submission
Oaktree Studio
PIA Merit award 2017
Creative output submission
Oaktree Studio
PIA Merit award 2017
Creative output submission
Oaktree Studio
PIA Merit award 2017
Overview
The project is situated in an area that is in a process of rapid densification due to new town planning proclamations. Most of the adjacent residential stands are being redeveloped to become high-density residential or commercial properties. The design repurposed the existing unremarkable single-storey house into a mixed-use typology by adding a second-storey design studio. Three courtyards were created by the addition of screen walls. The aim of the project was to make the building adaptable and versatile for multiple future possibilities. Specifically, the design needed to be able to easily transform without much intervention in terms of services and structure.
Creative research submissions
2020
As part of the submission by Pieter Mathews in collaboration with Dr. Hendrik Auret from the Department of Architecture of the University of Free State
Creative research submissions
2020
As part of the submission by Pieter Mathews in collaboration with Dr. Hendrik Auret from the Department of Architecture of the University of Free State
Overview
The project is situated in an area that is in a process of rapid densification due to new town planning proclamations. Most of the adjacent residential stands are being redeveloped to become high-density residential or commercial properties. The design repurposed the existing unremarkable single-storey house into a mixed-use typology by adding a second-storey design studio. Three courtyards were created by the addition of screen walls. The aim of the project was to make the building adaptable and versatile for multiple future possibilities. Specifically, the design needed to be able to easily transform without much intervention in terms of services and structure.
Adaptation of an old house
The existing ground floor plan of the original house was retained to separate the residential area from the studio. The tenant in the residential area has free access to utilize the entire ground floor space. Courtyard spaces on the ground floor allow the different users of the building (resident occupant, studio staff and cleaning / maintenance staff) different reprieves and varying levels of privacy. These are demarcated respectively by a screen wall of concrete blocks on the street front and re-used timber palettes planted with succulents on the northern side. Large sliding doors create the impression of a much larger ground floor space that is seamlessly connected to the exterior courtyards.
The staircase is treated as a separate form to the rest of the building and protrudes out of the building at an angle. This allows natural light to enter both levels and makes the staircase part of a cinematic journey through the space with views towards the street. Standard unplaned and untreated timber planks were used as treads with the rough unfinished concrete risers painted dark to visually ‘pull’ the staircase away from the white walls. The staircase surrounds an art display, allowing visual access from various perspectives.
The studio on the first floor is a new addition and is typologically treated as the archetypal Monopoly House. It is detached from the existing house and is wider than the ground floor which creates the impression that it floats above it. This creates additional floor space on the first floor, as well as a generous overhang, allowing large sliding doors on ground floor to remain open during most weather conditions. A balcony on the first floor serves as breakaway space with views toward the street.
Academic Framework: Architectural Adhocism in South Africa
The design approach to the Oaktree Studio can be positioned within the Adhocism framework as formulated by Charles Jencks and Nathan Silver in their polemic book Adhocism: A Case for Improvisation (2013). The most basic point of departure being the following: “Adhocism uses contingent situations as opportunities for resourcefulness and to produce contingent open-ended results” (Jencks & Silver 2013:9).
In the instance of the Oaktree Studio, a good relationship with an accommodating contractor and close proximity to the building site offered opportunities to make design decisions on site and continuously review the design of the building as the construction progressed. Moments of spontaneous ideas, which Jencks and Silver (2013:xv) referred to as “singular moment[s] of inventive combination”, were incorporated into the building and ideas were tested along the way. One such ‘inventive moment’ was the decision to lay pieces of model-building material that had been left over from a previous architectural model on the shuttering for the concrete floor slab. This created an interesting concrete pattern that references previous projects done by the firm in the concrete soffit above the boardroom.
Notions of speed and purpose, economy and utility are underlying principles that can be attributed to an Adhocist approach (Jencks & Silver 2013:viii): Available materials from the existing residential house were reused in the adaptation, such as the timber of the original roof trusses which were reused as cladding for cost-effective brickwork. This allowed money to be saved on plaster and paint to finish the walls. Building rubble from demolished interior walls were used as infill to create levels on the street-facing side of the building. By avoiding the carting away of building rubble, the building cost could be further lowered.
Instead of purchasing paving blocks to pave the pedestrian walkway leading up to the entrance of the building, concrete test cubes were collected from a nearby testing facility and installed as alternative. Some of the concrete blocks come from projects that the firm was involved in. Each block has different properties, creating a difference in colour and pattern that is especially observable when the footpath becomes wet.
Creative Contribution
An innovative use of circumstances, often not premeditated or intended on the drawing board, resulted in a simple yet poetic space. The Oaktree alterations were constructed from the physical resources at hand, and the relationships maintained with contractors, craftsmen and artists over the years. Oaktree Studio’s stamp of approval, literally added as a spur of the moment final touch, is the playful sculptural installation by Sybrand Wiechers Nailed It. The use of these existing resources in a new way embodies the “frugality and delight” advocated by Adhocism (Jencks & Silver 2013:viii).
Award + Public profile
Oaktree Studio was awarded a Pretoria Institute of Architects Merit Award for a Mixed-Use Developments in 2017. The building was featured in the Oct-Nov 2017 Issues of local design magazine Visi, as well as on other online publication platforms.
Bibliography
Project Publications
Archello. 2020. Oaktree Studios | Mathews + Associates Architects | Archello. [online] Available at: <https://archello.com/project/oaktree-studio> [Accessed 19 June 2020].
Crewe-Browne, M. 2017. The Second Story. Visi, October November, pp. 80-87.
Crewe-Browne, M. 2018. Hazelwood studio. [online] Available at: https://visi.co.za/hazelwood-studio/ [Accessed 3 July 2020].
Smit, J., 2017. Merit Award for Mixed Use Development: Oaktree Studio. PIA 2017 Citations, p. 12.
Works cited
Jencks, C. & Silver, N. 2013. Adhocism: the case for improvisation. Expanded and updated edition. Cambridge: MIT Press.